It’s time to stop using bite marks in forensics, experts argue

Posted by on December 1, 2016 4:01 pm
Tags:
Categories: health

Researchers are increasingly skeptical about the validity of bite-mark identification as trial evidence. A new paper describes the legal basis for the rise of bite-mark identification and reviews relevant empirical research on bite-mark identification — highlighting both the lack of research and the lack of support provided by what research does exist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *